|
The
end of the cold war had pulled down the proxy cover for leadership and
administrative inadequacies in and around Africa. The implication of
this is in form of new sets of challenges for the continent and its
leadership, in terms of devising concerted and workable strategies for
combating the myriads of problems the continent has faced. For a
continent that has remained volatile and vulnerable to external factors
and factions, the need has emerged over the years, to initiate a process
capable of operationalising emerging paradigms, concepts and new
attitudes as a means of increasing the capacity of the continent to deal
with its own problems by responding appropriately to the challenges
posed by globalisation and the new world order. In practical terms, it
is imperative that a strategic framework informs Africa’s engagement
with the rest of the world. Such an agenda, must in turn, evolve within
the framework of an African collective solidarity on issues of
socio-economic development, integration, security and stability,
democratisation and human rights.
Within
these broad challenges, the Africa Leadership Forum, as a continental
civil society organisation has been able to locate a central role for
itself. In consultation and active collaboration with the United Nations
Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) and the Organisation of African
Unity (OAU), the ALF organised a series of consultative meetings
culminating in the May 1991 Kampala Forum. This forum, which was
attended by over 500 participants from Africa and other parts of the
world, brought together presidents and peasants, professors and
students, trade union leaders and employers of labour. The result of
this meeting is the adoption of a comprehensive proposal for a
Conference on Security, Stability, Development and Co-operation in
Africa, (CSSDCA). This is known as the Kampala Document.
The
Kampala Document, in part, stipulated that peace, security and stability
are inseparable conditions and basis for development and co-operation in
Africa.
The
Kampala Document also provides a framework for collective action and for
co-operation on continental, regional and international basis. It
provides for co-operation among African states, between South and South,
and between North and South; economic integration of African states in
the African Economic Community; Joint development of common natural
resources; inter-dependence based on beneficial co-operative relations
with other developing and industrialised nations; supra-nationality
based on the need to devolve certain key responsibilities to continental
institutions.
Although
the CSSDCA was modelled after the Helsinki Process in Eastern Europe, it
has been defined and shaped by the specific realities of the African
environment. The CSSDCA process, thus has charted an invaluable course
and mechanism for Africa’s development based on self-reliance,
effective and responsive governance, regional integration and
international co-operation. Over the years, the CSSDCA proposal, often
described as Africa’s Magna Carta, has won the support of
numerous Africa states and especially non-governmental Organisations,
influential individuals and opinion leaders. It however, failed to
garner the very crucial support from the Organisation of African Unity,
OAU. The inability to secure the adoption of the CSSDCA proposals by the
continental body itself was however, largely a result of the phobia the
process has excited in vulnerable countries across the continent, which
feared the process might provide an instrument for curbing their free
reigns. This is to say that within the continental body itself, there is
no concerted opposition to the process itself. And, the two countries
that have overtly opposed it have done so purely on matters of national
policy.
However,
while the Kampala Document had not received the kind of instant applause
it deserves at the OAU level, it has nevertheless become a veritable
resource base for policy formulation in some countries and within some
regional or sub-regional organisations. For instance, the South African
defence policy was largely informed by the provisions of the CSSDCA.
Similarly, the SADC Inter-State Committee on Defence also drew largely
from the Kampala Document. The OAU Secretary-General’s initiative on
conflict management was also largely informed by security and stability
calabashes of the CSSDCA. The Entebbe Joint Declaration of Principles,
as signed by the US President Clinton and the Greater Horn region in
March, 1988 also drew in large measure from the CSSDCA. All these
indicate a various acknowledgement that the CSSDCA as a process has
provided the much-needed compass for policy definition on the continent.
Drawing from this conviction, the ALF has also adopted the Kampala
Document as the guiding document for its activities. Other NGOs,
Inter-governmental organisations, IGOs as well as governments have
equally found the document profound and useful. Consequently, for almost
a decade, and as an abiding commitment, the ALF has continually striven
to broaden the base of acceptance and support for the CSSDCA, both in
Africa and beyond.
>>>continue
|